0%
Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters.

SURVEY CLOSED - ROUND 2 Delphi consensus survey
-
Developing reading passages for the assessment of speech and voice

NB: THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN CLOSED. THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS STILL AVAILABLE IN ORDER TO ALLOW AN OVERVIEW FOR THE READER OF THE ARTICLE RESULTING FROM THIS STUDY. NO FURTHER RESPONSES AFTER NOVEMBER 22, 2020 WILL BE ANALYZED.
Investigators: Timothy POMMÉE1, Julien PINQUIER1, Virginie WOISARD2,3,4, Julie MAUCLAIR1, Renée SPEYER5
1 IRIT, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
2 CHU Larrey, Toulouse, France
3 Oncopole, Toulouse, France
4 Laboratoire Octogone Lordat, Toulouse, France
Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

 

University of Oslo - Wikipedia
      

 

Dear participant,

Many thanks for participating in the second round of this consensus survey. We are very grateful to you for taking a (significant!) amount of your time to complete the first round of our study.

Rest assured, this second round will be shorter than the previous one! It should not last longer than 20 minutes.

The survey for this second round is organized in 3 pages, for a total of 26 questions (all binary!).

As a quick reminder:
This Delphi study yields to seek agreement through an international decision-making process, on what criteria should be taken into account when creating a new reading passage for the assessment of speech and voice.

When assessing speech, both instrumental and perceptual measures can be used, the latter of which still seem to be the golden standard in clinical practice. Nonetheless, there appears to be a lack of consensus regarding the terminology of the perceptual concepts, as well as how to assess them.

Therefore, this consensus survey will be structured as follows: 
    1) Definitions of intelligibility and comprehensibility

    2) Perceptual and objective speech measures
    3) Criteria for creating standard reading passages

For each part, in grey boxes, you will be given a summarized feedback of the group’s responses in round 1 (n=40). You will then be asked to state your agreement with a series of assertions, by simply checking “agree” or “disagree”. You will be able to specify the reasons of your disagreement if you wish to do so. For each reference to a definition discussed in round 1, you can hover your mouse over the author's name to see the definition appear.

Please take time to answer each of the questions and provide as much information as possible.